Thursday, November 22, 2012

The Path Out of Malkuth. (Part 2)


Part 1 here.




OPIATE, n. An unlocked door in the prison of identity.  It leads into the jail yard.
                Ambrose Bierce, The Devil’s Dictionary.

1.
                It is an unfortunate tendency of people to move with considerable ease and briskness from one extreme to another; if an idea lacks anything at all in certitude and perfection, to abandon it as beyond salvage or compromise, and go instead with an equal vigour to its opposite.  Such was the case with Malcolm, although he would himself have been at a loss to define a specific or decisive moment when he had went from the light into the darkness.  He knew many people in his later years that spent a great portion of their time sifting through their memories, like gimlet-eyed browsers in old antique stores, looking for the precise moment wherein things had gone awry with them.  Malcolm wondered what it would have availed them to find such a moment; they could not alter their lives, but only know their overall shape with a greater precision.

               Malcolm envisioned the overall shape of life in general to follow after the experience of moving to a new city.  It is difficult to arrive in a new place without some sense of a renewal or heightening of life’s promise.  A new city presents us with endless possibilities for adventure, self-discovery and fulfilment.  When over-familiar with a place, we are over-familiar with ourselves; people know us, and we become in our own minds a quantity increasingly fixed, solid, and impermeable.  To relocate to a new place, particularly a city, will instantly undo the rigidity of our posture, and the sluggishness of our nervous systems.  We are no longer known by those about us, and hence our entire history vanishes away, and we feel as though we no longer know ourselves.  The city itself in its novelty is a place without a precise geography, a world whose contours are ill-defined, unexpected, and somehow entwined with the fleeting moods of our own imaginations.  We may come to know two specific places precisely adjacent to one another, and yet, arriving at them by wholly separate routes, conceive them to be worlds apart.  Then, when we finally discover their proximity by means of an adjoining laneway or alley, we are reminded of the fluid topographies of our dream-worlds, where disparate places are connected by an association or chain of ideas and moods.  This sense, however, is transitory.  In time, we come to know the city, and to know, as people say, where everything is.  The city becomes convenient and secure, but it ceases to surprize us, and we cease to surprize ourselves.

               This was how Malcolm, extrapolating from his own experience, conceived of life: the exultation of arriving in a new place, the giddy shock of self-conscious existence, the sense of timelessness and Protean possibility, gradually corroded by familiarity and deadened by habitual experience and perception.  The scientists had invented a way of looking into the brain whereby when a subject preformed a new task, they could see great clusters of electrical activity erupting across the strange tissued pathways and networks of the brain.  But once the task had become habituated, the electrical arabesques ceased to dance, and the structure appeared dormant.  So it was with life: a bright flash bursting outwards, and then receding back on itself into cool, mineral stillness.  From time to time, a certain part of the city would remind Malcolm of how he had felt when he first arrived there at the age of twenty, but these were memories in outline, like photographic negatives of an irretrievable emotion, and he apprehended a world washed out by an interminable sound like that of the traffic on the streets.


2.
                When he was twenty-three, Malcolm got a job in a factory that produced medical devices.  The devices were assembled and packaged in the factory, and then they were loaded into trucks from a warehouse to the rear of the building, and transported to the docks where they were then shipped to various foreign markets.  The different languages on the devices that Malcolm assembled were unfamiliar to him, and nobody on the assembly line knew precisely where they went.  They go to the warehouse, somebody told him.  It was a constant cycle: trucks arrived from the docks with the various component parts, and these were removed from their packaging in the docking area to the fore of the factory, and sent down along a conveyer belt to the main factory floor, where Malcolm and his colleges assembled them piece by piece into finished products; from there they were packaged and shelved in the warehouse, ready to be loaded onto the trucks and taken back to the docks as fresh, transformed commodities.

               The factory was located in an industrial park in one of the commuter belts on the fringes of the city.  Every morning, Malcolm rose at six for the two hour bus journey which would take him to the factory.  With his mind foggy and half-awake, he watched the gradual shift of the city’s topography: the beautiful older houses from the preceding centuries were concentrated in the centre, dwarfed by the office towers which had been built in the concluding decades of the last; these finally winnowed out into residential districts, where houses of various vintages were dwarfed by the gleaming apartment towers which had been the mirrored dream of the last economic boom; the residential districts eventually connected up with the old, outlying villages which the city had gradually absorbed in the slow march of its prosperous years; the villages and the suburbs then giving way to the commuter belts, to mazes of identical semi-detached houses broken up by identical chains of supermarkets and restaurants, the effect strangely that of a child’s toy or a designer’s miniature; finally, the bus passed through a visually anonymous lattice of traffic islands and motorways, into the industrial district, where motor showrooms and outdoor furniture emporiums formed little arcades around the parks themselves, and various multinational manufacturing centres were marooned in eerily sterile affectations of decoration and amenity.  Malcolm then went to a cleanroom where he washed and sterilized his hands, donned a pair of rubber gloves, white coat, and hair-net, before finally taking his place on the line.  He then day-dreamed and nodded off; a radio played behind a soothing white-noise hum of machinery.   At elven o’clock, they took their first break, eating sandwiches and smoking cigarettes along the banks of an artificial lake.
  
              For the first couple of years, Malcolm envisioned the job as a temporary necessity, and regarded the hours he worked as a waking dream, a dissociative and unreal adjunct to his authentic existence and identity.  He realized that the industrial parks were designed to facilitate this mentality; located in distant and anonymous zones on the fringes of the city, they allowed each worker to divorce their working hours from the rest of their lives, and believe ultimately in the unreality of their work.  In time, his sleeping dreams became those of his waking ones: he saw everybody sitting contently at their places while the factory autonomously carried out its own work.  The indolent workers were all happy and beaming.  The wrinkled old women looked like wide-eyed children.  Sometimes they performed comical pantomimes for one-another; these comical shows were interspersed with sudden, profound expressions that seemed to convey volumes of information.  Then the bell rang out, and they filed gravely towards the cleanrooms, exchanging final, pleading backward glances as they went.



 3.
                The paradox and peril of the idealistic tendency is that it expends a great deal of energy and time cultivating perfected, ideal, and ecstatic realities; and yet the activity of cultivating these realities must by its very nature negate the time and energy available to even begin to actualize them.   The idealist becomes adept at imagining and increasingly untrained in actualizing his imagining; in this sense, so as the grandeur and depth of his idealization increases, so the reality of his existence shrinks in perfect proportion.  The dream of the true idealist is that peculiar and deceptive lure which must always recede with just as much alacrity as we approach it, like the point where the curving arrowhead of the rainbow pierces the horizon.

               Of course, most of us are at least partially idealistic, since we maintain in adulthood some measure of the fully idealistic psychology which characterizes the greater part of our youth.  It is in fact considered an integral part of the process of maturation that we should shift both from a solipsistic or interior tendency to a socially integrated one, and, in a parallel and mutually reinforcing motion, from an idealistic to a realist perspective, the two primary meanings of the term idealist being in this sense very closely aligned.  Hence, the real idealist is he or she who does not, at least at first, yield up their idealistic conceptions to the inevitable upheavals and disappointments which maturation foists on all of us in greater or lesser degree.  Exhibiting a measure both of tenacity and belligerent stubbornness, the idealist refuses to accept the world as it must be in opposition to the world as he or she would fashion it; hence, the idealist refuses to meet the world on its own terms, but rather increases their own narcotic capacity to dream and imagine, the need of the imagination becoming more acute in proportion to the extent to which the reality of the world belies its productions.

Another qualification must be added: the type of person who actually succeeds in large part in actualizing their interior designs and conceptions cannot be regarded as the type of idealist which we have in mind.  This type of person is rather a realist whose peculiar strength of will renders the actuality of their existence indistinguishable from that idealized by the average person.  If the true idealist, on the other hand, were ever to realize but one of their dreams, then its effect could only be that of an extreme deflation or disappointment.  It had never been the object of the dream, but rather the dream itself, which had so intoxicated the imagination; never the thing itself, but rather the patient interior sculpting of things at best only dimly possible.  As Narcissus mistook his reflection for another living person, so the idealist squanders all the world for gazing at its reflection in a mirror of their own precise framing.

In this sense, there must come to every idealist a moment of crisis, wherein they can no longer persuade themselves that their dreams are ever to be realized; the realization that their dreams have been all along an escape from life, rather than an engagement with its higher possibilities.  They would, of course, have experienced many minor upheavals of confidence along the way, but those would always subside, and give way to the idealist’s habitual condition, his peculiar sense of happiness and equilibrium which borders on a kind of liminal ecstasy: the feeling of things just on the giddy brink of their realization, the rapture of old and tenaciously guarded dreams come finally to the verge of their full fruition.  But there must come the time when this liminal ecstasy can no longer be regained or ever more credited; and time is itself the crucial ingredient in the undoing of the idealist.  Given an unlimited surfeit of time, the human mind would tend towards a general idealism, contemplating all conceivable things and infinitely delaying action; if the body were not subject to the gradual excoriations of time and the inevitability of its final closing of accounts, then materialism would be a perverse and esoteric doctrine of the few.  It is precisely because of our relationship with time that most of us are idealistic in our youth.  It is then that we have, or feel ourselves to possess, that great surfeit of time in which everything yet appears possible, and action can yet be delayed.  When the slow, boundless, novel time of childhood fully gives way to the familiar, repetitious, and ever accelerating time of the adult, then comes the call to action, and the sense of the meagre insubstantiality of what was only inwardly contemplated or imagined, as opposed to that, however imperfect, which might have been attained in actuality.



4.
                When he was twenty eight, Malcolm drifted into a mood of peculiar, affectless despair.  It was a despair which had a quality not of emotion, but rather of an idea, of a logic pursued with detached and analytical rigour.  It came upon him not as a swoon of unrealized desire, or a tender sense of loss or incapacity, but simply as a precise conviction of how he stood in relation to the world.  Having this calm, cerebral character, his despair did not interrupt the outward flow of his life during the daylight hours, but at night he began to suffer from an acute insomnia.  He considered taking sleeping tablets, but this idea troubled him for some obscure reason; he felt as though he were being nudged into a necessary wakefulness during the hours of darkness, as though there was something there which he was meant to find.  He started to take short walks along the canal adjacent to his apartment, and as the duration of these walks gradually increased, so Malcolm slowly became a habitué of the city at night.

               Initially, this nocturnal existence merely took the form of long and aimless walks.  To walk aimlessly has a character significantly different to that of walking with a set destination or purpose.  The anticipated destination – or some sense of a further removed eventual destination – provides a colouring on the places that intervene along the way.  Knowing our own door to be open to us, and some warmth and comfort to reside behind our shuttered windows, makes all those other doors and shuttered windows that we pass seem less oppressive and unfriendly.  To the habitual street walker, however, to he or she who has no home, and no appointments or destinations, this comfort is denied, and everything they pass is coloured only with the absence of a destination, and the knowledge that no quietude will ever dim the noise of the street.  The street walker becomes intimately acquainted with those merely functional or abandoned in-between spaces that constitute the swift and shifting points of transition along the journeys of others.  In many regards, these spaces make up the greater part of the city’s constitution – the bulk of the people flow towards its few and widely dispersed vital organs, passing through the larger net of transitory and anonymous spaces that knit the system together.  In this sense, the maze of outlying motorways, traffic islands, and footbridges capture the essence of the city: austere and nominally designed spaces which were only ever meant to be passed through.  The sound of the city, similarly, is generated by individuals all with individual psychologies and motivations, and yet each one working together produces a sound as motiveless and alien to human psychology as the ceaseless sound of the ocean.  In this manner, cities become simultaneously the most populous and the loneliest spaces on earth; in aggregating human intentionality and purpose, and refining them down to an all-encompassing calculus of concrete and machinery, the city finally attains to the ineffable abstraction of the natural world.

               At first, Malcolm confined his strolls to the canal, enjoying in a limited sense the comparative solitude of the city in the early hours.  Having stolen away from his bed with an at best obscure sense of purpose, he felt as though the spaces which he moved through were unoccupied, as though he himself were not present to them.  In this manner, the scenes he observed all had the quality which the city will sometimes assume in a heavy frost or snowfall: the quality of a frozen and unoccupied pictorial exhibition, or an abandoned amenity whose erstwhile function remains discernible despite a lengthy abeyance.  Feeling his own presence to be somehow insubstantial and ghostlike, the sound of the wind rustling through the trees and rushes filled him with an intimation of the continued life and animation of empty places, of its obliviousness to the more variegated and unsteady human tempers which moved through them.  Swans occasionally glided along the surface of the canal, unruffled and unmoving as the current carried them with an almost dreamlike mixture of purpose and hypnotised submission to the disposition of their environment.  Malcolm passed by various human architectures which had in the past concretized the aspirations and identities of specific socioeconomic classes; in the last decade, these distinctions had tended to fall away, retaining their character only in the architectural forms themselves, and abandoning the lives within to an increasing similitude of aspirational horizons.  In this sense, he felt that his own dreams were aligned to those of the landscape, as though one had been memorialized by the other, and both rendered distant and historical.

               From time to time, he encountered petrol stations whose shop floors were still open.  The majority were closed and served their customers via hatches, but some remained open all night.  These were the first nocturnal social environments which Malcolm explored, and they offered comparatively little scope for human drama.  They were frequented by a very sporadic flow of policemen, late-shift workers, revellers, and the hard-pressed and aging prostitutes who worked along the canal; for the most part they were empty with the exception of their impassive Indian proprietors.  Malcolm spent an inordinate amount of time browsing the isles of those cramped shop floors, gazing intently at rows of confectionary and packaged sandwiches as though they were exhibits in a gallery installation.  He dreamed of encountering others like him – a new subculture of somnambulists who had mutually and simultaneously disavowed the tide of purposeful existence, congregating instead with a kind of animal instinct in the abandoned and in-between spaces of the city, moving with affectless and lazy grace between the isles, communicating only through body-language to avoid the tedium and dishonestly of words, a congregation of beautiful and despairing souls whose sleep was troubled by vague intimations of reason, and whose wakefulness was spent walking aimlessly amid the ineffable dreams and non-sequiturs of the world.


Continued Shortly.

Sunday, November 11, 2012

La Rotunda del Mer: The Strange Lovecraftian Statuary of Puerto Vallarta.


Located on the beachfront of the Mexican resort city Puerto Vallarta, "La Rotunda del Mer" is a stunningly eldritch installation by the painter and sculptor Alejandro Colunga.


Pictures from Wired, via feuilleton.

Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Dream Logic on Film: Dario Argento’s Inferno.




There are sacraments of evil as well as good about us, and we live and move to my belief in an unknown world, a place where there are caves and shadows and dwellers in twilight.
Arthur Machen, The Red Hand.

Dario Argento’s Inferno is a film that maybe one person in ten would actually sit all the way through.  Even among aficionados of the once great Italian auteur’s filmography, it’s a highly divisive entry, adored by some and regarded by others as a considerably lesser stylistic rethread of Suspiria.  It is off-putting to casual film viewers for a variety reasons, not least the dissociative, often unintentionally comic English dubbing common to much Italian horror cinema.  Compounding this, Inferno abandons all but the merest skeleton of conventional narrative logic, becoming a succession of set-pieces, at times almost having the character of autonomous short films,  held together only by the ghost of a narrative, and a deeper, errant logic of dreamlike correspondences.  Virtually everything about the film gives it the feeling of something operating entirely in its own secluded realm.  Its cast are largely unknowns, and compound their obscurity by playing characters as affectless as the marionettes we become in the deepest stages of dreaming.  Much of its action is centred claustrophobically around a set which depicts a baroque New York apartment building, its sense of location being even more ghostly and unreal than the “New York” Stanley Kubrick created in Pinewood Studies for Eyes Wide Shut.  All these things, combined with its distinct lack of a narrative centre of gravity, give the film the air of a disembodied, almost musty objet d’art; a film not so much dated as never belonging to a distinct temporal filmic current to begin with.  And yet, despite its flaws, it may be one of the purest and most abstract of all horror films.


 Argento started out working in the giallo tradition, a distinctly Italian film genre which combined visceral and graphic horror elements with the conventions of detective and whodunit fiction.  The giallo film style was initiated by Mario Bava’s dazzling Sei donne per l’assassino (Blood and Black Lace, 1964), and formed the basis for the less sophisticated American slasher film.  Working in this medium, the plots of Argento’s earlier films are essentially linear, conventional, and logical.  But only to a certain extent.  Argento always asserted that the primary difference between his cinema and that of his oft cited influence Alfred Hitchcock lay in a classical divergence between the Latin and Anglo-Saxon temperaments.  Hitchcock’s cinema was supremely calculated, logical, and rational; Argento saw his work, on the other hand, as more passionate, instinctual, emotional, and undisciplined.  This blunt comparison does some violence to both artists, but nevertheless highlights a defining characteristic of Italian thriller/horror cinema.  Though their plots could occasionally be ingeniously woven, the giallo’s energies were primarily focused elsewhere: in baroque visual spectacle and operatic passion, in bravura style and sensory excess. 



Detective/mystery fiction is a mode supremely conducive to the rational temperament; the detective is a logician who uses deductive reasoning to impose order on a world subject to the disruptive acts of the criminal and the madman.  In this sense, it is a genre predicated on the satisfaction of the logical resolution, but which nevertheless maintains a fascination, even an obsession, with the disruptive pole of unreason and perversity.  In Blue Velvet, Laura Dern tells Kyle MacLachlan “I don’t know if you’re a detective or a pervert.”  Argento’s early cinema perfectly exemplified this slippery dichotomy between the detective and the pervert: director, protagonist, and audience all remain enthralled by the POV of the killer.  In a crucial sense, they are the killer, just as the gloved hand was always Argento’s own.  Considering Argento’s considerable identification with the unreasonable aspect of the detective’s soul, it is unsurprising that he gradually drifted away from the logical patina of his earlier films, into more exotic realms.  Following the transitional masterpiece Profondo Rosso, Argento did just this with the first of what are called his “supernatural” films: Suspiria (1977) and its loose sequel Inferno (1980). 



To understand what Argento was trying to achieve with these films, it is helpful to look at their primary literary influence: Suspiria de Profundis, a collection of short poetic essays written in “impassioned prose” by Thomas de Quincey, and intended as a companion piece to his phantasmagorical classic Confessions of an English Opium Eater.  In Levana and Our Ladies of Sorrow, de Quincey begins by discussing the role of Levana, the Roman deity evoked during rituals of childbirth.  He imagines that Levana maintains a subtle influence and control over the education of those children whose birth she has anointed:

By the education of Levana, therefore, is meant,—not the poor machinery that moves by spelling-books and grammars, but by that mighty system of central forces hidden in the deep bosom of human life, which by passion, by strife, by temptation, by the energies of resistance, works for ever upon children,—resting not night or day, any more than the mighty wheel of day and night themselves, whose moments, like restless spokes, are glimmering for ever as they revolve.
De Quincey thus develops the rather shadowy Roman deity into a personification of some of the subtle forces operant in the world that act on individuals and mould their character.  Since grief and suffering are perhaps the keenest crucibles in which character is shaped, de Quincey imagines Levana operating in counsel with a trio of personified figures that encompass between them the whole gamut of human suffering:

Therefore it is that Levana often communes with the powers that shake a man’s heart: therefore it is that she dotes on grief. “These ladies,” said I softly to myself, on seeing the ministers with whom Levana was conversing, “these are the Sorrows; and they are three in number, as the Graces are three, who dress man’s life with beauty; the ParcoeÅ“ are three, who weave the dark arras of man’s life in their mysterious loom, always with colours sad in part, sometimes angry with tragic crimson and black; the Furies are three, who visit with retribution called from the other side of the grave offences that walk upon this; and once even the Muses were but three, who fit the harp, the trumpet, or the lute, to the great burdens of man’s impassioned creations. These are the Sorrows, all three of whom I know.” 
These are de Quincey’s “Ladies of Sorrow” – by name, Mater Lachrymarum, Our Lady of Tears, Mater Suspiriorum, Our Lady of Sighs, and Mater Tenebrarum, Our Lady of Darkness – which become the “Three Mothers” in Argento’s movies.  De Quincey intended the Sorrows to serve as anthropomorphic symbols for the universal, abstract forces which between them engender all individual instances of human suffering: “If I say simply, “The Sorrows,” there will be a chance of mistaking the term; it might be understood of individual sorrow,—separate cases of sorrow,—whereas I want a term expressing the mighty abstractions that incarnate themselves in all individual sufferings of man’s heart; and I wish to have these abstractions presented as impersonations, that is, as clothed with human attributes of life, and with functions pointing to flesh. Let us call them, therefore, Our Ladies of Sorrow.”

In in Argento’s treatment, the Sorrows become a trio of ancient and powerful witches who exercise their malefic influence from three specifically designed buildings – one in Friburg, Germany, one in Rome, and one in New York.  On the one hand, Argento’s movement from the detective to the supernatural mode represents a transition from realistically orientated, narrative-based cinema to a more abstract and purist cinema.  In some respects, this is a natural progression from the giallo’s tendency to privilege stylization and ornamentation over plot to begin with.  In Suspiria, the lush, otherworldliness of the style becomes more pronounced, with a heightened focus on architectural design, lighting, spatial composition, and a soundtrack barrage that threatens to overwhelm even the decadent richness of the imagery.  What is left of conventional plot becomes elusive, fairy-tale or dream-like, and insubstantial in and of itself.  However, while artistic abstraction plays a significant role in both Suspiria and Inferno, it serves a function beyond mere wilful aestheticism.  The detective seeks to maintain the logical consistency and order of a world into which unreason and insanity make only temporary incursions.   In his supernatural films, Argento attempted to create a world which was somehow irrational and threatening at its core – a world which could never facilitate the logically ordered conclusion of the detective story.  In the giallo, the threat is localized in the figure of the killer, while in Suspiria and Inferno, the power of the witch is all-pervasive and non-local – it can be channelled through people, animals, and inanimate objects.  Operant through architecture and the elements, through wind, water, and flame, it is part of the fabric of reality, part of what de Quincey calls “that mighty system of central forces hidden in the deep bosom of human life.”

In this sense, although Argento follows the symbolical attributes of de Quincey’s Ladies of Sorrow only very loosely, Suspiria and Inferno achieve a very close approximation of the spirit of the text.  The Three Mothers are the outward forms of subtle and abstract forces which are deeply embedded in the whole fabric of the world.  In a strikingly composed sequence in Suspiria, Suzy Bannion expresses her fears regarding the existence of a coven to a psychologist (played by a young Udo Kier).  Although he attempts to downplay her anxiety with a defence of rational materialism (“Bad luck is caused by broken minds, not broken mirrors”), his older college Dr Milius asserts “In all times, in all places, magic is all around us.”  In many respects, this serves as a keynote for the two films: the world as kind of a panpsychic dream (or nightmare), completely contrary in nature to the order of daylight reason and logic.  Argento is thus attempting to craft a kind of mystical or metaphysical horror, and in this he follows de Quincey, who argues that the activities of the Sorrows are so pervasive and abstract that they cannot be readily articulated by reason or language:
  
            Do they talk, then? O, no! mighty phantoms like these disdain the infirmities of language. They may utter voices through the organs of man when they dwell in human hearts, but amongst themselves there is no voice nor sound; eternal silence reigns in their kingdoms. They spoke not, as they talked with Levana; they whispered not; they sang not; though oftentimes methought they might have sung, for I upon earth had heard their mysteries oftentimes deciphered by harp and timbrel, by dulcimer and organ. Like God, whose servants they are, they utter their pleasure, not by sounds that perish, or by words that go astray, but by signs in heaven, by changes on earth, by pulses in secret rivers, heraldries painted on darkness, and hieroglyphics written on the tablets of the brain. They wheeled in mazes; I spelled the steps. They telegraphed from afar; I read the signals. They conspired together; and on the mirrors of darkness my eye traced the plots. Theirs were the symbols; mine are the words.
Suspiria introduced this panpsychic dream world by using Jessica Harper as a reference point to the familiar, everyday world which the audience could identify with, and by maintaining the rudiments of a conventional narrative structure.  Inferno has always been a more difficult, alienating film.  Like Psycho, it has a roving cast of protagonists: first Irene Miracle’s New York poetess Rose Elliot, then Eleonora Giorgi’s Roman music student Sara, and finally Rose’s brother Mark, virtually the only significant character to survive, and achieve a Pyrrhic and almost arbitrary victory over the forces of evil at the end.  Inferno has no point of reference or connection to the real world, and remains enveloped in its own self-consistent but utterly inexplicable dream logic from beginning to end.  Reflecting the influence of Michelangelo Antonioni, Argento has always devoted considerable screen time to observing characters, usually female, exploring and interacting with their environment.  In Inferno, this tendency reaches an extreme level of abstraction, coming perhaps as close as film ever has to an Expressionist/Surrealist painting in three-dimensions:





 Inferno inevitably pales in comparison with its predecessor.  The production is less lavish and expansive, and the imagery somehow less indelible.  It fares considerably less well with its lead; whereas Jessica Harper’s almost cartoonishly cute features blended perfectly into Suspiria’s Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs influenced Technicolor palette, Leigh McCloskey is a wooden and occasionally grating presence.  Keith Emerson’s score has grown more on than away from me, but virtually nothing could compete with the sublime incantatory noise that the Goblin summoned for Suspiria.  Nevertheless, Inferno remains perhaps the bolder and more interesting of the two, a film which at its best attains a strikingly pure Gothic grandeur and a rare sense of the ineffability of dreams and nightmares.