Historical
events are inevitably viewed with the benefit of hindsight, and this can
sometimes play funny tricks. Events can
acquire a certain eerie prescience or sense of tragic irony with the benefit of
hindsight. This, we assume, is only
because subsequent events happened to
follow a certain course, and retrogressively imbue what went before with an air
of inevitably, or the odd presentiment we sometimes have of future events
laying a trail of bread combs towards their eventual actualization. In his 1927 essay An Experiment with Time, the aeronautical engineer and eccentric
philosopher J.W. Dunne proposed that anybody who keeps an assiduous record of
their dreams will find the events of their conscious existence prefigured again
and again in the errant, muddled juxtapositions of their dreams. The sceptic reasonably supposes that Mr Dunne
was merely allowing his subconscious to cold call him, and retrogressively
connecting the Rorschach blobs of his dreams to events which could have gone
any number of different ways, just as we are do with historical events when we
know their outcomes. Playwrights and
authors can foreshadow, but in reality tomorrow never knows. Any sequence of events would probably assume
peculiar contours when subjected to a sufficient degree of scrutiny. In the film Blow Up, David Hemmings’ jaded photographer studies and enlarges a
series of his photographs until a narrative of murder begins to emerge in their
murky borders. The Zapruder film of the
Kennedy assassination has been similarly over-analysed, to the extent that some
conspiranoids have made so bold as to suggest that it depicts the driver firing
the fatal shot.
Nevertheless,
some historical sequences are stranger than others; and some, like the Kennedy assassination,
become virtual strange attractors, weaving about themselves a maddening web of
connections and coincidences, and leaving a trail of melted brains in their
wake. The Manson story has similar
strange attractor properties; circling around its black centre one finds a
rich, dense tapestry of post-war popular culture. What lends the Manson story to conspiranoid
readings is the extent to which all its various elements seem to fit together,
either directly or in a more oblique fashion, like the details of a bad
dream. The next two posts are a study of the
peculiar linkages between the Beatles’ White
Album, Roman Polanski’s Rosemary Baby,
the Manson murders, and the rise of the Church of Satan as a Randian cult of
hedonistic individualism in the late 60s.
These linkages can be read as revealing the tendrils of a vast Satanic
conspiracy…..or as a series of non sequiturs strewn together with the logic of
a pothead flicking between documentaries and camp horror films on late night TV…..as
a sidelong glance into the synchronistic underworld of causality…..or just a
particularly diabolical addition to the popular awesome people hanging out together meme.
“All of them Witches.”
In her first significant
film role, Sharon Tate played a seductive witch in a British occult thriller
called Eye of the Devil, released in
1966. Apart from Tate’s involvement, the
film is largely remembered today as a less distinguished precursor to The Wicker Man and the folk/pagan horror
genre which became popular in British cinema and children’s television in the
late 60s and throughout much of the 70s.
Like Rosemary’s Baby, the folk
horror genre didn’t come out of nowhere; it was a cultural reflection of a real
sociological trend. The failure of
Victorian and Edwardian notions of rational and technological progress, writ
large in the carnage of the World Wars, had led to a frantic scramble to
discover new values which stood at variance to the failed ideologies of both
Christian monotheism and technological modernism, and out of this emerged the
second great occult revival in the modern West.
A massive neo-pagan revival had been underway in Britain and elsewhere
since the fifties, and one of the great myths underlying and animating this
movement was the idea of the return of
the Old Ways. In brief, this was the
notion that the old, animistic covenant between man and the natural world, and
all its traditions and practises, had never been fully vanquished by either
Christianity or the Industrial Age. The
Old Ways remained as vital as ever under the surface, waiting to be
rediscovered, re-invented, or in some cases simply invented out of whole cloth.
The witchcraft revival in Britain had been initiated by the colourful naturist
and magician Gerald Gardner in the late forties. It was, however, to Alex Sanders, the most
noteworthy of the Wiccan revivalists after Gardner, that the makers of Eye of the Devil turned to act as a
creative consultant in order to insure that the rituals in the movie had a
certain degree of authenticity. While
making the film, Sharon Tate became acquainted with Sanders and his then wife
Maxine, and Sanders claimed to have initiated her into the Alexandrian
tradition of witchcraft. This is a
fairly plausible assertion, and probably true, although, like a great many
occult leaders, Sanders was by no means averse to tall tales and the lure of
attention and publicity. At any rate, he
was not averse to appearing in irresistibly kitsch exposes (in every sense of
the word) such as the following:
Also in 1966,
Frank Sinatra married Mia Farrow. As a
wedding present, Salvador Dali gave Farrow an owl, parts of a frog, and a moon
rock. (A word to the wise surrealist:
give up the day job when you’re selecting wedding presents.) It was a bizarre coupling, the considerable
age difference being in 1960s America a difference between two worlds, between
Kansas and Oz. Sinatra was a walking
contradiction. Professionally, he was
one of the most sensitive and emotionally intimate performers in popular song;
privately, he was a control freak, bully, cultivator of unsavoury alliances,
and one of the century’s most prodigious users of women as objects (known admiringly
among his cronies as the “Pope of Pussy”). Sinatra had revolutionized American popular
music in the 50s, but by the time he married Mia Farrow, his era had distinctly
passed. Farrow was one of the flower
children. Her androgynous look reflected
changing sexual mores and tastes; when Sinatra asked Shirley MacLaine for her
opinion, she replied “What do you say about someone who looks like a twelve
year old boy?” A certain legendry
surrounds Farrow’s cropped, pixie haircut which is worth mentioning here. Farrow gave herself the cut with fingernail
scissors in ‘65 while working on Peyton
Place. As a Vidal Sassoon cut is
mentioned in the Rosemary’s Baby
novel, Farrow’s androgynous haircut became a significant feature in Polanski’s
adaptation. She wears a wig in the
earlier scenes, before appearing with the cropped cut and announcing, “I’ve
been to Vidal Sassoon’s”. Her narcissistic
husband (played by director John Cassavetes) is disgusted by the new look. It’s an oddly powerful moment in the film,
which intensifies the viewer’s sympathy for Farrow’s vulnerable, put-upon
Rosemary. (In time, the fiction of Rosemary’s Baby became mingled with
fact, and popular legend had it that Farrow got her hair cut specifically for
the film, and a repulsed Sinatra served her divorce papers on the set for this
reason.)
When she first
cut it, Salvador Dali told Farrow that the act constituted a “mythic suicide”. Coincidentally, in July of ’69, Manson
exhorted the female Family members to commit an act of “mythic suicide” by
shaving her heads. According to Sanders
in The Family: “Just before dawn,
Charlie sent Brenda from the ranch with scissors bearing a wonderful
announcement: it was the time for the sacred witchy Tonsure Rite. Charlie said that they were ready to cut
their hair – for, at last, their egos were dead.” The appearance of Manson’s shaven headed
young followers constituted a considerable element in the visceral shock of the
media coverage of the trial.
Rosemary’s Baby, which shot in late ’67,
did put paid to Farrow and Sinatra’s marriage however. The movie was running over schedule, and
Sinatra wanted Farrow to appear in his film The
Detective. It was another instance
of fact and fiction becoming comingled. In
the movie, her character Rosemary was manipulated and exploited by her
self-centred actor husband in order to further his career; in reality, Farrow
had to stand up to her self-centred and manipulative singer/actor husband in
order to stay in the picture. This she
did, and Sinatra responded by serving the aforementioned divorce papers on
set. When events started to spiral out
of control after its premiere, producer William Castle came to regard Farrow’s
marriage as the first casualty of the Rosemary’s
Baby curse. There is no doubt that
even on the surface, Rosemary’s Baby
constituted an eerie preface to the grizzly tragedy which overtook Polanski’s
Cielo Drive residence (a few doors away from the home of The Outer Limits and Psycho
screenwriter Joe Stefano) within a year of the movie’s release. With its themes of a contemporary satanic
cult, and the anxiety of a young first-time mother regarding the safety of her
unborn child, subsequent events made Rosemary’s
Baby seem uncomfortably close to home – especially bearing in mind that
Polanski even considered casting Sharon as Rosemary for a time. (Also, since the film concerns the drugging
and rape of a young woman, it is difficult not to associate this with the
subsequent event which would forever tarnish Polanski’s reputation.) Scraping under the surface, however, one
finds a peculiar web of coincidences surrounding Rosemary’s Baby which Robert Anton Wilson would have labelled a “synchro-mesh”
in his heavy Chapel Perilous days.
“To 1966, The Year One!”
The novel Rosemary’s Baby was a bestseller for Ira
Levin in 1967. It had a strong hook –
anxiety about first-time pregnancy – and the theme of contemporary urban occultism
give it a topical flavour in the same year which the musical Hair proclaimed “The dawning of the Age
of Aquarius”. Like Levin’s later The Stepford Wives, it had a strong feminist
undertow – the real menace of Rosemary’s
Baby is arguably the patriarchal desire to subjugate and control the female
body. The novel (and subsequent movie,
which remained very faithful to the source) is unusually specific about its
temporal setting. It starts in the latter
part of ’65 (the year of the first Papal visit to the U.S.A.), but is primarily
set in ’66, the year of Eye of the Devil
and Mia Farrow’s marriage to Frank Sinatra.
“To 1966, The Year One!” the
coven leader Roman Castevet toasts during a New Year celebration, and Rosemary’s
baby is born June ’66 (6/66). Coincidentally,
in the more or less real world of 1966, a small group gathered in a house at
6114 California St, San Francisco, on April 30 (Walpurgisnacht) to proclaim 1966 the Year 1, Anno Satanis, “the first year of the Age of Satan”. This house belonged to Howard Stanton Levey,
a former carny man, nightclub organist, and weird fiction enthusiast who had
fashioned himself Anton Szandor LaVey.
It would later be known as the Black House, and function as the headquarters
of his creation, the Church of Satan, until his death in 1997.
In fairness to
him, LaVey was neither the most interesting, nor the most risible, of America’s
many spiritual/occult entrepreneurs.
Prior to the establishment of the Church of Satan, he had gathered a
fairly interesting salon of writers and occult dabblers to the Black
House. LaVey became friends with a
number of writers associated with the legendary Weird Fiction magazine, and seems to have known the great ClarkAshton Smith through this connection.
Attendees at his parties included the sci-fi/fantasy legend Fritz
Leiber, king of sci-fi/monster movie fandom Forest J Ackerman, and the irrepressible
mischief maker Kenneth Anger. These parties
maintained a little of the ambience of the scene which had converged around
Jack Parsons’ chaotic Pasadena mansion in the forties – a curious melting pot
of pulp writers and occultists chasing the outer limits. (Another LaVey associate of the time, Anthony
Boucher, wrote a famous locked room mystery novel called Rocket to the Morgue in 1942, which contains thinly veiled portraits
of Robert A Heinlein, L Ron Hubbard, Jack Parsons, and various other Golden Age
figures. The plot of Rosemary’s Baby is not unlike a Christianized
version of Parsons’ bizarre and fascinating Babalon Working.) There is a certain incidental David Lynch
character charm to LaVey at this point – I mean, the guy plays the Wurlitzer at
a cocktail lounge called the Lost Weekend, and keeps a large black leopard
called Zoltan as a pet. Bizarrely, a
local American Humane Association television programme for children called The Wonderful World of Buzz came to
visit LaVey’s house in 1964. This,
needless to say, before the joint was called the Black House, and notorious for
nudie orgies and HAIL SATAN chants.
LaVey’s satanic
philosophy mixed Nietzsche and Ayn Rand with the post-war economic boom hedonism
of Hugh Heffner’s Playboy, and served
them up with a dressing of Dennis Wheatley’s occult pot-boilers. In a sense, its core philosophical values of
individualism and self-gratification were perfectly in tune with the realities
of mainstream America during the full bloom of the consumerist era, and
illustrate the slippery slope by which the 60s counter-culture gradually fell
into the vapid self-absorption of the Me generation of the 70s. This materialistic angle LaVey mixed rather incongruously
with the ceremonial magic and initiatory grade left-overs of the Golden Dawn
which innumerable other neo-pagan groups were experimenting with at the
time. What alone distinguished LaVey’s
group was its open avowal of the satanic image, and this one suspects was
merely a piece of theatrical branding on the part of LaVey, a carny man at
heart who knew how to stir up the rubes and get them to step right up. Contrary to popular urban myth, LaVey appears
to have had no direct involvement with the making of Rosemary’s Baby. It was long
supposed that he had acted as a creative consult for the film, and even rumoured
that he donned the devil suit during the film’s disturbing dream/rape sequence. These stories were most likely put into
circulation by LaVey himself, and probably possess no more substance than his
claim to have had an affair with a pre-stardom Marilyn Monroe during his
nightclub days. That said, LaVey did act
as a special consultant to a satanic horror picture, but it just wasn’t quite as prestigious as Rosemary’s Baby:
(You can watch
the whole thing here. I’ve watched a lot
of bullshit in my time, but I haven’t gotten around to this one yet. I probably will, though. You know you can rely on Shatner’s resume
between Star Trek incarnations.) Although not explicitly connected with the
making of Rosemary’s Baby, many
tangential links remain between the Church and the movie and subsequent Tate/La
Bianca murders. During the early days of
the Church of Satan, LaVey took to a fairly time-honoured American strategy for
drumming up publicity: he ran a “Topless Witches Review” in a theatre in San Francisco. One of his nudie witches was Susan Atkins
(using the stage name Sharon King); Atkins of course became a member of Manson’s
Family, and would later claim that she “felt nothing” as Sharon Tate begged her
for the life of her unborn child in the house on Cielo Drive. In 1968, probably shortly prior to the
release of Rosemary Baby, Sinatra’s
Rat Pack compadre Sammy Davis Jr was hanging out in a LA club called the Factory
when he encountered a group of actors whose fingernails were varnished red as a
sign of their affiliation to the Church of Satan. The actors invited him to a party back at the
Black House, and Sammy, being constitutionally up for anything, went along.
Sammy
discovered a scene which he described as “dungeons and dragons and debauchery”,
and which must have looked like The Omega
Man for Me generation hedonists. All
of the guests were clad in hooded robes or masks, and a nude woman was chained
to a central red-velvet alter. “That
chick was happy” he later observed, “and wasn’t really going to get anything
sharper than a dildo stuck in her.” As
Sammy Davis was beginning to get settled into the festivities, one of the
revellers approached him and pulled back his hood. Small world: it was his hairdresser. Smaller world: his hairdresser was Jay
Sebring, Sharon Tate’s former lover and fellow Manson Family victim. Sammy Davis Jr’s interest in the Church of
Satan persisted into the mid-70s, and was probably at its height in 1973 when
he produced and starred in a NBC pilot called Poor Devil, which endeavoured to kick-start the world’s first ever
satanic sitcom. Needless to say, the
world wasn’t ready for canned Left Hand Path laughter, and it was shit. Coincidentally, Sammy’s thelemically titled
autobiography Yes I Can is featured
prominently in Rosemary’s Baby; we
first see Rosemary reading it early on in the film, and it is later shown on the
Woodhouse bookshelf next to the occult tome Rosemary has gotten from Hutch.
In the next instalment: Mia
Farrow decamps to India to groove with the Beatles and the “giggling guru” Maharishi
Mahesh Yogi, and William Castle slips into an extremely conspiranoid reality
tunnel in which he begins to believe that he and Paramount Pictures have
unleashed a satanic curse upon the earth.
Books: Lords of the Left Hand Path by Stephen E Flowers, and The Family by Ed Sanders.
5 comments:
Speaking of The Devil: http://tsutpen.blogspot.com/2013/01/life-during-wartime-8.html
A while back I was going to mention that I missed Kirby Dots, but I appreciate the way you currently weave your observations around your obvious knowledge and appreciation of the cinema. So I don't miss Kirby Dots so much anymore. Does that make sense...I think so!
Unless I missed it you haven't mentioned that John Lennon got assassinated at The Dakota building, which was where Rosemary's Baby was filmed. So the Polanski/Manson/White Album connection becomes further entangled there. Oo-ee-oo.
Nebris - cool send off! I follow that charlie parker blog, but missed that one for some reason.
Mike - might revive kirby dots at some point, I dunno. Traffic was pretty slack so I concentrated more on this one.
folk horror - Oo-ee-oo indeed! I'm going to cover the Lennon/Dakota thing in the next and final part.
Props for this. Could easily be expanded into a book. We see patterns everywhere and some of them are pretty. Equally, some are not.
Post a Comment