Behind the initials was a
metaphor, a delirium tremens, a trembling unfurrowing of the mind’s
ploughshare. The saint whose water can
light lamps, the clairvoyant whose lapse in recall is the breath of god, the
true paranoid for whom all is organised in spheres joyful or threatening about
the central pulse of himself, the dreamer whose puns probe ancient foetid
shafts and tunnels of truth all act in the same special relevance to the word,
or whatever it is the word is there, buffering, to protect us from.
Thomas
Pynchon, The Crying of Lot 49.
The name is an
anagram.
Rosemary’s Baby.
Investigation
revealed that the singing group the Beatles’ most recent album, No. SWBO 101,
has songs titled ‘Helter Skelter’ and ‘Piggies’ and ‘Blackbird’. The words in the song ‘Blackbird’ frequently
say ‘Arise, arise’ which might be the meaning of ‘Rise’ near the front door.
from
the LAPD’s “First Homicide Investigation Progress Report – LaBianca”, compiled
in late august ’69, while the Tate and LaBianca murders were still considered
separate investigations.
Mirror mirror
my mirror my my mirror.
Sirhan
Sirhan.
Live Freaky, Die Freaky.
The
White Album was released in November
of 1968. One of its most contentious
tracks will prove to be Revolution 9,
John Lennon’s eight-minute, Stockhausen-inspired sound collage. Lennon described the piece as a “painting in
sound; a picture of revolution” and “an unconscious picture of what I actually
think will happen when it happens, just like a drawing of revolution.” The number 9 was a lifelong obsession of
Lennon’s – he was born on the 9th of October, 1940, and throughout
his career recorded several 9 centric songs, including One after 909 and Revolution
9 with the Beatles, and #9 Dream
as a solo artist. While the aural chaos
of Revolution 9 may have proved
enervating to the average listener, it fitted right into the fraying mindscape
of Charles Manson. Manson apparently saw
the White Album as folding into the
Biblical Book of Revelation to
produce a blueprint for an apocalyptic race war which was about to engulf the
US, and in which Manson and his followers were destined to play a crucial role. Manson associated Revolution 9 with the 9th chapter of Revelation, which begins with the
following:
1.
And the fifth angel sounded, and I saw a star
fall from heaven unto the earth: and to him was given the key to the bottomless
pit.
2.
And he opened the bottomless pit; and there
arose smoke out of the bottomless pit, as the smoke of a great furnace; and the
sun and the air were darkened by reason of the smoke of the pit.
3.
And there came out of the smoke locusts upon the
earth; and unto them was given power, as the scorpions of the earth have power.
To understand
how Manson interpreted these lines, we turn to one of the most peculiar aspects
of the belief system which most sources ascribe to the Family. The idea of a hidden society of ascended
masters dwelling in an underground cavern is a recurring motif in the occult revival
of the 19th century. The
notion of a hollow earth and of underground cities is one of the many points of
intersection in the histories of fantastic literature, contemporary occultism,
and pseudo-scientific speculation. Madame
Blavatsky occasionally wrote about the Buddhist myth of the underground kingdom
and Pure Land of Shambhala; when the world had finally reached the brink of
utter destruction through greed and war, one version of the myth asserts, the
Lord Maitreya will emerge from Shambhala to usher in a Golden Age. The French occultist Alexandre Saint-Yves
d’Alveydre claimed that in 1885 he initiated a series of telepathic contacts
with the ascended masters who dwell in a subterranean cavern world called Agartha.
As in the Buddhist myth of Shambhala, Agartha is the location of the
world’s enlightened guardians and future rulers. Bizarrely, Manson seems to have developed a
very similar eschatological myth while hanging around in Death Valley in 1968.
According to
Saunders in The Family:
In Hopi legend there
was a myth called the Emergence from the Third World wherein there was a
reference to a large underground world from which the Hopi nation emerged to
dwell on Earth’s surface. Manson
believed that here was some geological possibility for the existence of The
Hole.
Sometime in the fall
of 1968, Manson grew zealous about The Hole.
He thought The Hole was a large underground city where he could live
with his family and escape from the profligacies of the mother culture.
Manson’s
eschatological narrative basically went as follows. A fierce and bloody race war erupts between
the whites and blacks. The Mansonoids
avoid the bloodshed by escaping, via a large pit somewhere in Death Valley, to
an underground city of milk and honey.
The blacks win the race war, but find themselves unfit to govern post-Skelter
America; Charlie and the Mansonoids then emerge triumphantly from The Hole to
take the reins. The weirdest part of the
whole lunatic scenario remains the underground kingdom, which the Family seem
to have ardently believed in. According
to Charles “Tex” Watson, “it was exciting, amazing stuff Charlie was teaching,
and we’d sit around for hours as he told us about the land of milk and honey
we’d find under the desert and enjoy while the world above us was soaked in
blood.” In the above passage quoted from
Revelations, Charlie interpreted
himself to be the “star which had fallen from heaven unto the earth”, and who
had been given the “key to the bottomless pit.”
Sanders remained baffled as to where precisely Manson got the idea
from: “It is not known who or what
inspired him to believe that a subterranean paradise was waiting for him and
his followers. Perhaps it was a vision
on an acid trip. Who knows?” What is also peculiar about Manson’s scenario
is its similarity in general outline to the cavern world myth going back to
Shambhala; Manson becomes the ascended master, the future ruler of a world
which has descended into anarchy, who emerges finally from the cavern world to
initiate a Golden Age of prosperity and proper governance. Perhaps Manson had encountered these ideas
during his period of occult and scientological study in Terminal Island; or
perhaps, tripping on acid in the desert, he’d received a garbled download from
the same loop of the Akashic Record that zapped
Alexandre Saint-Yves d’Alveydre in 1885.
No sense makes sense.
Charles
Manson.
What we do
know, however, is that the only “bottomless pit” Manson succeeded in opening
was the abyss of sadism and violence submerged in the minds of his own
followers. The Family’s gathering
momentum of apocalyptic violence had already resulted in a drug-related
shooting and the prolonged harassment, torture, and eventual murder of music
teacher Gary Hinman. The door into the
abyss was finally opened wide on the weekend beginning August 9th,
1969. Crimes are in one sense like works
of art: there are always a multitude being perpetuated, and only a small few in
which a certain confluence of elements work in harmony so as to haunt the
imagination, and thus become memorialized by history. Crimes and acts of terrorism are like
negative art-works that generate unease instead of catharsis, and influence the
collective imagination in an often subliminal fashion, like flashes of
half-remembered dreams. The killings at
10050 Cielo Drive had perhaps the most potent impact on the American psyche
since the assassination of JFK in 1962.
As the Cielo killings involved famous people related to the movie
industry they were instantly a communal experience, since a great part of the
function of fame and the movies is to gather the experience of the collective
and refine it down into archetypes which can be exchanged and preserved for
posterity (similar, in a sense, to the function of the polytheistic pantheons,
which were so often found to be ourselves, only immortalized and on a far more
lavish scale.) Both the Kennedy and Tate
murders registered subliminally as a sacrifice of youthful sexual energy and
fertility, JFK embodying an idea of profligate masculine virility, and the
heavily pregnant Tate a contrary image of idealized young motherhood.
Other elements
conspired to lend the events of that weekend their eerie, morbid and enduring
fascination. Coupled with a considerable
brutality, the activities of the Family seem at first chaotic and random; under
closer scrutiny, however, so many odd coincidences and linkages accrue around
them so as to suggest not so much an organised conspiracy, as a bleeding out of
the Family’s own schizoid thought processes into their surroundings. The real meaning of helter skelter, unbeknownst to Manson, may have been the moment
where the paranoiac can no longer distinguish between the world at large and
the world as it is reflected through his own nervous system and thought
processes; the two become one. Something
like this seems to have happened to the Mansonoids: Susan Atkins told her
cellmate Virginia Graham that in order to kill Sharon Tate she had to kill a
part of herself; when asked by a shrink why he hated his father, Steve “Clem”
Grogan responded: “I’m my father and I don’t hate myself”. Manson speaks to this day of his
consciousness, in panpsychic or pantheistic terms, as existing in all things,
as partaking in universal consciousness.
The moral of the story, or one of them at any rate, might be that you
should probably burn off any violent or homicidal tendencies before turning off
your mind to groove in the Godhead.
There was also
the particular context and timing of the killings, which came as a stark
interruption of Hollywood’s eager enjoyment of the hedonistic experimentation
of the 60s. When the frailty and
seriousness of life intrudes upon prolonged frivolity and play, it can easily
assume the superstitious proportion of a kind of judgement from on high. The fresh-faced and glassy eyed Mansonoids
crept into Hollywood’s day-glo free-for-all like the mysterious robed figure in
Poe’s Masque of the Red Death; like
the emergence of the AIDS virus at the end of the 70s, the killings fell on the
popular imagination like a thunderclap of divine retribution. In the Hollywood enclave itself, a major
freakout erupted; in Ed Sanders expression, fear swept the poolsides. People directly linked with the Polanski set
were shell-shocked. Friends of Jay
Sebring employed the famous psychic and Andrija Puharich protégée Peter Hurkos
to perform a reading on the crime scene.
Others, caught up in the
intricate webs of their own shenanigans and peccadillos, feared that the Red
Death might creep through their driveways next.
According to Bugliosi’s Helter
Skelter, Frank Sinatra was in hiding, and Mia Farrow wouldn’t attend Tate’s
funeral, fearing that she would be next.
Steve McQueen fled briefly to England (according to Paul Kastner) and
began carrying firearms at all times.
Lee Marvin was afraid. In the
popular press, the killings were often subtly presented as the unavoidable
consequence of the victims themselves playing with fire: Frykowski, Folger, and
Sebring were keen recreational drug users, and it was noted that Sebring had a
penchant for tying up and lightly whipping many of his paramours. Hence, much of the media coverage implied
that the doom that fell on 10050 Cielo Drive could not have been entirely uninvited:
As Steven Roberts, Los
Angeles bureau chief for the New York Times,
later put it, “All the stories had a common thread – that somehow the victims
had brought the murders on themselves….The attitude was summed up in the
epigram: ‘Live freaky, die freaky.’” (Helter Skelter, Bugliosi.)
Live freaky, die freaky. In some respects, this could serve as an
epigram for the whole mythic idea which was later woven around the Manson
killings – the idea that they were somehow an inevitable consequence of the 60s
counterculture, rather than simply a brutal and shambolic crime spree that
netted their perpetrators 72 dollars in change and convictions as a foregone
conclusion. However, if the Manson
murders weren’t the hand of vengeful god smiting down the excesses of
Hollywood, or the Lord of the Flies kill-cult
that the flower-children had, sooner
or later, to degenerate into, they nevertheless remain a strange attractor for
bizarre coincidences and dreamlike weirdness.
A couple of examples: during the early stages of the investigation, when
drugs were considered the primary motivation, the LAPD hunted down a drug
associate of Frykowski named Jeffrey “Pic” Pickett. Although Pickett came to nothing as a
suspect, he provided the detectives with a video tape of Frykowski and Abigail
Folger in the house on Cielo Drive while the Polanski’s were away. (Why Pickett had this tape in the first place
remains a little mysterious.) The tape
showed little of consequence; Frykowski is drunk, and Folger upbraids him for
his habit of drinking heavily during drug come-downs. The detectives were unnerved by the very
prominent sound of a knife grating on bone while Abigail Folger carves the couples
roast supper. Stranger still, at another
point Folger gently mocks Frykowski for a time when he ran to get his camera
after seeing a vision in the fireplace.
The vision was of a blazing pig’s head.
(The Mansonoids called their victims piggies, of course, and some
variation of the word was written in blood at the three main Manson crime
sites.) When Susan Atkins was
incarcerated in Sybil Brand for her participation in the Hinman killing, she
very promptly (and unwisely) confided the whole narrative of the Tate/LaBianca
murders to a cellmate called Virginia Graham.
That this Virginia Graham would coincidentally happen to have known Jay
Sebring on a casual basis is bizarre enough, but dig this: in 1962, when Graham
and her husband were looking at properties around LA, they actually visited
10050 Cielo Drive. The algorithmic
strings of figures or terms that weave together reality generally follow a
pattern of wide and random dispersal; occasionally, they come closely bunched
together in a peculiar fashion more suggestive of the associative logic of the
unconscious or creative mind. The Manson
saga, for whatever reason, abounds in these glitches. Even Manson’s tireless and straight-shooting
prosecutor Vincent Bugliosi wasn’t immune to occasional spasms of the Fear:
Midway through the
arraignment I looked at my watch. It had
stopped. Odd. It was the first time I could remember that
happening. Then I noticed that Manson
was staring at me, a slight grin on his face.
It was, I told myself,
simply a coincidence.
(Helter Skelter.)
I’ll Be Your Mirror: John Frankenheimer, Bobby Kennedy, and Sirhan
Sirhan.
Back to 1968,
the year of peace, love, and political assassinations, and the summer of Rosemary’s Baby. The eccentric feminist and would-be
playwright Valerie Solanas procured a gun that summer, having fallen into a
paranoid reality tunnel wherein Olympia Press honcho Maurice Girodias and chic
vampire Andy Warhol were conspiring to steal her artistic endeavours for their
own personal aggrandisement. On June 3,
Solanas wandered into the Factory at around noon and shot Andy Warhol, sending
shockwaves through the national media, and particularly among the amphetamine
gobbling ghouls who converged around the Factory. A couple of years earlier, Warhol had
produced, so to speak, the seminal debut record by the Velvet Underground, The Velvet Underground and Nico. The album alternates between moods of pent-up
violence and delicate sensitivity, between raucous nights and melancholy
mornings. One of the most
memorable of its quieter moments is the remarkably beautiful love song I’ll Be Your Mirror, written by Lou Reed for the group's striking
German chanteuse Nico. Although it was
deemed ultimately impractical, Warhol proposed that the record be produced with
a deliberate scratch at the end of this track, so that Nico’s singing of I’ll be your mirror would repeat into
infinity, or however long it took the listener to get up and change the damn
record. Which could in some instances
have been a very long time indeed, considering the foibles of the era. But the scratch was better left out. The song suggests a fraying and broken mind
which might be saved by the pure affirmation of love, or by a mirror that showed
the light in the image rather than the dark; the crack in the record, on the
other hand, would have suggested the mind unravelling, and the mirror breaking
into shards.
Meanwhile, in
a bungalow in Pasadena, Sirhan Sirhan had been spending hours gazing at his
reflection in a candlelit mirror, trying to increase his powers of
concentration. Like the Mansonoids, his sense
of the boundary between the world and his own mind is dissolving. He believes at times that he can move objects
with his thoughts, and his reading has shades of Manson’s itinerary on Terminal
Island: self-hypnosis, Rosicrucianism, and a pamphlet entitled Mental Projection – You Can Project Things
Metaphysically Right Into Being.
That he developed the capacity to hypnotize himself seems scarcely in
doubt – after long sessions gazing into the mirror, Sirhan fills a notebook
with automatic writing which he later has no recollection of composing. The notebook provides ample evidence that
Sirhan was a lone fruitcake, or a crudely set-up patsy, depending on which side
of the rainbow you sit on:
My determination to
eliminate R.F.K. is becoming more the more of an unshakeable obsession…R.F.K.
must die – RFK must be killed Robert F. Kennedy must be assassinated R.F.K.
must be assassinated – Robert F. Kennedy must be assassinated before 5 June 68
Robert F Kennedy must be assassinated I have never heard please pay to the
order of of of..
Later asked
under hypnosis if he was hypnotized when he wrote the notebook entries, Sirhan
Sirhan relied yes, yes, yes. Asked by whom, Sirhan writes Mirror mirror my mirror my my mirror. Like Warhol’s scratch, repeating into
infinity. Even if there is no truth to the
various conspiracy theories, Sirhan Sirhan must be regarded as a kind of
Manchurian Candidate, insofar as he may have been programmed by his own
reflection in the mirror, an idea which seems almost punned upon in his name.
On the day
that Valerie Solanas shot Andy Warhol, an exhausted Robert Kennedy was staying
in the Malibu home of Manchurian
Candidate director John Frankenheimer.
Kennedy was an admirer of Frankenheimer’s movies, and Frankenheimer had
directed all the promotional material for RFK’s presidential campaign. The pair had become close friends, and
Frankenheimer claims that they even discussed Bobby’s suspicions regarding his
brother’s death, although the issue of the mafia was strictly off-limits. Kennedy’s time in the Malibu house was laden
with portents of the coming assassination, however. Two weeks previously, Pierre Salinger had
thrown a lavish lunch for Kennedy in the Malibu beach house, which was attended
by Warren Beatty, Burt Bacharach, Angie Dickenson, and various other
luminaries. The actress Jean Seberg,
perhaps the originator of the pixie haircut worn by Farrow in Rosemary’s Baby, was there with her
husband, the French writer Romain Gary.
At one point in the evening, a shirtless RFK sat cross-legged on the
floor, drinking orange juice after a surf.
Gary was immediately struck by the Kennedy mystique of athleticism,
handsomeness, and affluence, and shocked the gathering by announcing “You know
that somebody is going to try to shoot you?”
(Seberg would later commit suicide at age 40, a victim of FBI
blacklisting and slander for her support of the Black Panthers and other
causes.) On the night of June 3rd,
Frankenheimer and Kennedy discussed the Warhol shooting. “The country is gone mad”, said an
exasperated Kennedy, “absolutely mad.”
The next day,
Robert Kennedy won the California Democratic primary and was shot and fatally
wounded by Sirhan Sirhan after midnight in the kitchen of the Ambassador
Hotel. Kennedy had been driven to the
Ambassador by John Frankenheimer. (Some
sources place Polanski, Sharon Tate, and Mama Cass Eliot at the Malibu
beach-house on June 5th, which would be a true conspiranoid bonanza,
but I can’t confirm this from reputable or non-conspiranoid sources.) That it should have been Frankenheimer, of
all people, that drove RFK to his fatal encounter with Sirhan Sirhan in the
Ambassador is surely an extremely bizarre coincidence. Frankenheimer’s ‘62 classic The Manchurian Candidate effectively
created the pop culture mythos of the programmed, brainwashed political
assassin, with handlers and specific triggers.
That there was a legitimate drive to create real Manchurian candidates
by Mk-Ultra and other clandestine programmes stresses the degree to which the
movie walked a fine line between fantasy and some of the elusive and shadowy
realities of the Cold War period, as did its prescience of the conspiracy
theories that would later emerge surrounding the figures of Lee Harvey Oswald,
and perhaps to an even greater degree, Sirhan Sirhan. Adding to the weirdness, Sirhan claimed at
one point that his sudden desire to assassinate Robert Kennedy was triggered
during his viewing of The Story of Robert
Kennedy, a half-hour campaign documentary which had been directed by
Frankenheimer. As Frankenheimer later
described the scene in the Ambassador prior to the shooting, "Bobby said,
'When I say, "Let's win it in Chicago", go and get the car. I'll come right out.' I was standing there in an archway, feeling
like someone in The Manchurian Candidate;
I can see Bobby's face on a big television monitor in the ballroom and I can
see his back for real. As I stood there a figure went by me and it was as if
there was electricity coming out of his body. I've never felt anything like it
before or since. Of course, it was Sirhan Sirhan.” The director went to wait in the car, and of
course, Bobby never came out to join him.
Had he not been shot, the plan was for Frankenheimer to drive Kennedy on
to a victory celebration in the Factory nightclub. Not the Factory in New York where Warhol had
been shot, but the LA Factory where, as described in Part 3, Sammy Davis Junior
met some actors with painted fingernails who turned him on to the Church of
Satan.
Grail Marcus
wrote the following, regarding the weird vibes surrounding The Manchurian Candidate:
“Then it (the film) went
missing. Certainly, among those who
remembered it, as year after year people continued to tell others about it,
about how they had to see it, only to discover that they couldn't, there was a
feeling that the film might be part of the inexplicable cycle of assassinations
that followed it - a feeling that went far beyond anything in, say, Richard
Condon's Manchurian Candidate in Dallas,
published in the December 28 1963 edition of the Nation (an article by the
author of the source novel); Rather it was a feeling that the film was part
of the supposedly scattered but obviously whole, complete, singular event that
the cycle of assassinations comprised: its transformation of what in the United
States had been taken as open, public life into private crime or hidden
conspiracy. And there must have been a
feeling, as the film itself stayed hidden, that the country's real history,
history as it is lived out every day, its fundamental premises of work and
leisure, love and death, might be a kind of awful secret that no one would ever
understand.”
The Last Salvo of the Rosemary’s
Baby Curse: John Lennon, Aliens and the Dakota.
No one I think is in my tree
I mean it must be high or low
That is you can’t you know tune
in
but it’s alright
Strawberry Fields Forever.
To
double-up for the “Bramford” (named for Bram Stoker) apartment house in Ira
Levin’s novel, Roman Polanski chose to use the Dakota, a 19th
century co-op apartment building with a vaguely gothic air, for the exterior
shots in Rosemary’s Baby. Located near Central Park in the Upper West Side
of Manhattan, the building had a long history of housing notable artistic and
cinematic figures, including, aptly enough, Boris Karloff. John Lennon moved into the Dakota in
1973. He was at this point struggling to
finalize his green card, and under considerable scrutiny form the whole
alphabet soup of the US National Security Apparatus. Also in ’73, Lennon separated from Yoko Ono,
and began an 18 month relationship with her personal assistant May Pang, a
period which Lennon subsequently referred to as his “Lost Weekend”. A year later, on the 23rd of
August 1974, Lennon and Pang witnessed what they believed to be a flying saucer
over New York. That this experience
should occur during a year and a half long “Lost Weekend” may engender a degree
of scepticism, but it certainly had a profound effect on Lennon, prompting him
to note the following on the sleeve of the “Walls
and Bridges” album: “On 23 August 1974 I saw a UFO JL”. Perhaps Magic Alex had finally succeeded in
constructing his UFO with the engines of John and George’s cars, but this seems
unlikely. I’m not certain, but I don’t
think the ’74 sighting took place at the Dakota, but there is a stranger story
regarding Lennon, UFOs, and the Dakota which is worth noting briefly. The Israeli silverware trickster Uri Geller,
who was a close friend of Lennon during his New York years, tells us that
Lennon confided in him that he experienced a classic alien abduction encounter one
night in the Dakota. I’ve blogged about
this before, in the spectacularly titled I am the Eggman: The Geller/Lennon UFO Connection, so I’m not going to go into the details of the story this
time around. As irresistible as this
yarn is, I’d always taken it to be most likely an invention out of whole cloth
from Geller, but it actually turns to have some corroborative evidence in its
favour (in the sense, that is, that Lennon may actually have believed the
incident to have occurred, and confided it in Geller.) In a separate interview, when asked whether
Lennon had any experience of UFOs prior to the ’74 sighting, May Pang said that
yes, Lennon told her that he believed he may have been abducted as a child in
Liverpool, and he sometimes suspected that this was why he felt so different
from other people. Curiouser and bloody
curiouser.
During
a screening of one of his films in Hawaii in 1980, Kenneth Anger was approached
by peculiar young man who kept asking if he knew Anita Pallenberg and Mick
Jagger, or John Lennon and Yoko Ono.
Anger tried to get away from the youth, and when they finally shook hands,
he was given two 38-caliber bullets. On
the 7th of December of that year, the same youth accosted James Taylor at the 72nd
Street Subway Station, laying what Taylor labelled “some freak speak” on him
about John Lennon. The youth was of
course David Mark Chapman, and the next day he shot John Lennon dead outside
the archway entrance of the Dakota. Here,
many of the threads of our somewhat loose narrative converge for one last time:
The White Album, Rosemary’s Baby, the cycle of assassinations of iconic 60s figures
which cast such a pall of unease over Americans of that generation, the related
myth of the Manchurian candidate (in whose number many conspiracy theorists
placed Chapman), and the obsessive influence of specific works of art on
seemingly senseless crimes (the White
Album on the Tate/LaBianca murders, and JD Salinger’s The Catcher in the Rye on the shooting of John Lennon.) Chapman told the police a few hours later “I’m
sure the large part of me is Holden Caulfield, who is the main person in this
book. The small part of me must be the
devil.” The small part obviously
won. William Castle, who’d died three
years earlier, would have lost his mind.
In
1997, Ira Levin wrote a sequel to Rosemary’s
Baby called Son of Rosemary. The novel begins in 1999, with Rosemary
waking from a coma she has been in since 1973, apparently a result of a spell
cast by the coven. There is a great deal
of plot which is not worth rehashing here, but the book has a peculiar
metafictional twist. After being brought
down into Hell by Satan, Rosemary awakes to find herself in bed with her
husband Guy…..in 1965. All of the events
of Baby and its sequel transpire to
have been a dream. 1966, Anno Satanis,
the first year of the Age of Satan has not happened yet. But Rosemary and Guy are looking for an
apartment (the Bramford of her dream having been inspired by her reading of Dracula) and her friend Edward Hutchins
offers them an apartment rent-free for a year in the Dakota. Rosemary
experiences a strange unease related to her dream, and turns down the
offer. In the fictional universe of
Levin’s novels, then, whatever rough beast it was that crawled its way through
a maddening collage of song-lyrics and movies and Indian sages and desert
psychopaths and Hollywood orgies never made it as far as the fictional Bramford
of 1966 to be born, to say nothing of the real Dakota and Hollywood of 1968 to
be born again in a swelter of assassinations and paranoia and weird scenes which
were about to look very strange in the glare of the morning, and the scrutiny
of a thousand flashbulbs. Perhaps Levin
realized on some level that art, as the great mediator between the worlds
within and the world without, was no idle make-believe, as we have seen
countless times in this narrative, be it in Seconds
frying Brian Wilson’s brain, or The White
Album and The Catcher in the Rye crystalizing
and giving shape to the fraying psyches of Charles Manson and David Mark
Chapman, or in the peculiar sense that The
Manchurian Candidate and Rosemary’s
Baby acted as reverse mirrors to events which followed after them. Despite many theories to the contrary, it seems most likely that the tangled web of intentions underlying the Tate/LaBianca murders was primarily motivated not by the people who were killed, but by the locations where they happened to be on those nights. The killings traced a psycho-geography of Los Angeles which was rooted in Manson's experience of the city, and in so doing created a pattern, a web of connections, which have baffled and fascinated ever since, owing to that mixture, so beloved of conspiranoids, of the appearance of randomness and the suggestion of occulted order. The foregoing essays have attempted to trace the rich, disjointed map of postwar culture which emerges in this pattern; by routes alternatively eerie and tenuous, it has pointed us to some strange places.
An trove of Manson-related archive footage: The Manson Family Definitive.
Nicely done and presented. I appreciate the hours and effort invested as well as the artistic merit.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Mike!
ReplyDeletewhen you have a moment I'd like to invite you to take a look at my blog Tristan.
ReplyDeleteGreat post. Manson had spend much time in prison by the time he created his family so I am sure he had plenty of time to dream up a variety of tales to charm his followers. Most psychopaths are able to easily create this type of "reality".16
ReplyDeleteHey, Mike, I actually always meant to say I had a look at your art ages back, when it was on a different site, and was really impressed. I'll have a proper trawl through the stuff you have on the current blog when I get a chance, and if I ever get around to putting a blogroll on my sidebar (which I've been meaning to do for ages) I'll put a link up there to you. Good work!
ReplyDeleteFantastic stuff!
ReplyDeleteThanks, Robin, I'm glad you enjoyed it.
ReplyDeleteInteresting posts. Have you seen the 1973 Oscar-nominated Manson documentary directed by Robert Hendrickson and Laurence Merrick?
ReplyDeleteNo, but I'll have to try and chase down a copy of it at some point, looks pretty intense. Have you seen it?
ReplyDeleteyes, it's great - if you liked Ed Sanders' The Family then you'll love it. See also the follow up, Inside the Manson Family.
ReplyDelete